ThePass the Fault
New Republic
Michael B. Oren
4 July 2005
Ticket lines for movies are rare in Israel, and rarer still for features that have already been showing for five weeks, and unprecedented for a German production centered on the character of Adolf Hitler. Yet Israelis are still lining up to see Oliver Hirschbiegel's tenebrous docudrama about the Third Reich's closing days, "Der Untergang"--The Downfall.
The film, which has won several German awards and has been nominated for an Oscar, triggered nervous debate in Europe over its depiction of Hitler not as a one-dimensional monster but as a flesh-and-blood person, cruel and temperamental at times, but sympathetic and even fatherly at others. In Israel, where it is officially a crime to call a Jew a Nazi, the portrayal of the ultimate Nazi as anything less than demonic is bound to arouse controversy. But Israeli audiences have responded exuberantly, praising actor Bruno Ganz and his nuanced Hitler. Interviewed on Israeli television on Holocaust Memorial Day, Moshe Zimmermann -a historian who was once sued for comparing settler children to Hitler Youth- posited that this new, human Hitler served to demythologize Nazism and show how even normal people might be seduced by evil.
But Zimmermann thoroughly missed the point of the movie--as did most Israelis who saw the film. "The Downfall" is not about Hitler, human or otherwise, not about Nazism and evil. It is about letting Germany off the hook.
The film opens in 1942, when the 22-year-old Traudl Junge is chosen by Hitler to be his personal secretary. The Führer is here seen as an affable man, crinkly-eyed and patient, even when Traudl fails at typing his dictation.
Fast-forward to late April 1945, and Germany is on the brink of collapse. The Russians have penetrated Berlin, and Hitler, his Nazi cronies, and his staff are locked in an underground Bunker. The denizens of this lair are divided between Junker-type generals [such as Wilhelm Keitel, Alfred Jodl, and Wilhelm Mohnke], who know that the war is lost and want to surrender honorably, and deluded lackeys [such as Propaganda Minister Josef Göbbels and Eva Braun, Hitler's paramour], who insist that non-existent German armies can still turn the tide and ultimately save the Reich. Armaments Minister Albert Speer makes an appearance and sides with the generals, while Heinrich Himmler favors allying with the Americans against Russia. A tremulous Hitler wavers between these positions, alternatively despairing and defiant. And beside him throughout stands Traudl, who, though bereft of hope, refuses to abandon her Führer.
While focusing on this subterranean drama, the film veers off into two subplots, both set in the Bosch-scape of Berlin. The first features Ernst-Günter Schenck, a military doctor who ignores orders to abandon the city and remains to attend to its wounded. The second follows Peter Kranz, who, though only a boy, destroys two enemy tanks, while his father, a one-armed veteran, struggles to drag him from the battle.
The wickedness, the senselessness, the horror--all might have combined into soul-wrenching confession about a nation's descent into barbarity. But "The Downfall", based largely on the self-expiating memoirs of Traudl and Speer, is concerned with exoneration, not penance, and realizes it through manipulation and deceit.
Take, for example, Traudl. She is the perfect ingenue: modest, demure, incapable of uttering an unkind or scatological word. Unsullied by ideology, she gapes incredulously every time Hitler makes an anti-Semitic remark. And, though she is played by the irresistible Alexandra Maria Lara, the Traudl character is portrayed as mostly sexless. She elicits not a single lascivious stare, much less a pinch, from any of the Bunker's besotted officers. The real Traudl Junge, however, joined the Nazi League of German Girls at age 15 and was later elected to the elite Faith and Beauty society, whose members often mated with party stalwarts.
When Junge's trial period as a Hitler's secretary was about to end she was summoned in front of Hitler for the confirmation of her new job. She was expecting a loyalty oath, countless background checks, and to be forced to join the Nazi Party. Instead Hitler only wanted one promise from her: Since she would be a young girl working among a lot of male military personnel, she would have to promise to report to Hitler any harassment by them.
In December 1942, she became the youngest of the Nazi dictator's personal secretaries.
"He was a pleasant older man who welcomed us with real friendliness," she said of their first meeting. Among her recollections of the Führer was that he did not like cut flowers because, he said, he did not want to be "surrounded by corpses".
Other Nazis are similarly rehabilitated by the film. Ernst-Günter Schenck was an SS officer accused of performing experiments on prisoners at Mauthausen. Keitel and Jodl were both executed for war crimes--a fact mentioned just once before the closing credits--and Mohnke was charged with massacring Allied POWs.
French judge Henri Donnedieu protested vehemently against Jodl's conviction. Judge de Vabres was of the opinion that it was a miscarriage of justice for Jodl to be convicted because he had never joined the Nazi Party. However, the other three judges were unanimous that he should hang, and de Vabres was overruled.
On 28 February 1953, Jodl was posthumously exonerated by a German de-Nazification court, declaring Jodl not guilty of breaking international law and citing de Vabres' dissenting view as justification, while ignoring the majority view. The major impetus for overturning the ruling seems to have been so that his confiscated property could be returned to his widow.
This "not guilty" declaration was revoked on 3 September 1953 by the Minister of Political Liberation for Bavaria.
According to sources quoted by an ABC television programme broadcast in the United States, Wilhelm Mohnke was debriefed by the CIA on his release. His CIA files show that he provided information on fellow Nazis and SS veterans, in return for money and a guarantee of immunity from prosecution by the Germans or the British.
War crimes trials had ended, and with the advent of the Cold War, the US saw the Soviet Union as the main threat. A former US military Intelligence officer said that by 1955 the Americans were anxious to interview any former senior Nazis leaving Russia, to find which of their colleagues might have become Soviet agents, and to find how much the Russians had learnt about senior ex-Nazis in the West.
In January 1994 year the German government ruled there was insufficient evidence for a prosecution of Mohnke over the killing of 90 British prisoners in a barn at Wormhoudt, near Dunkirk, in 1940, or for the massacres in 1944 of 130 Canadian prisoners in Normandy and 72 Americans in the German Ardennes offensive.
In the movie, Mohnke is depicted as a humanitarian pleading with Hitler to evacuate civilians and arguing with Göbbels against the suicidal deployment of poorly armed militia [Volkssturm] against the Red Army.
In one dramatic encounter, Mohnke protests to Göbbels against the pointless sacrifice of aged militia men. Göbbels retorts that they had consented to Nazi rule and "now their little throats are going to be cut". The effect is to engender contempt for the heartless Nazi Propaganda chief and sympathy for his hapless victims who were hoodwinked into giving their mandate to a gang of murderous thugs.
However, the scene is invented. The only source is the postwar memoir of Hans Fritzsche, who served in the Nazi Propaganda ministry. Fritzsche claimed to have heard these words at the last Göbbels press conference, not addressed to Mohnke. . The only source is the postwar memoir of Hans Fritzsche, who served in the Nazi Propaganda ministry. Fritzsche claimed to have heard these words at the last Göbbels press conference, not addressed to Mohnke.
Speer, who is seen boldly ignoring Hitler's orders to destroy Germany's infrastructure, constructed his buildings with slave laborers. And the Wehrmacht, which is painted in such heroic colors that the audience cannot help but root for it, was complicit in countless atrocities.
What, Gott in Himmel, is going on here? Clearly, "The Downfall" is distinguishing between bad Germans [a small band of Nazis] and good [everyone else]. The Bunker's debauchery is contrasted with the suffering of simple Berliners, and Hitler's desire to destroy the German people for failing to win the war is compared with the army's determination to fight even though victory is impossible. The dusky lynch squads who hang Peter's father serve as a counterpoint to the fair-haired children who try to help others escape, and the ghoul-faced Göbbels is the reverse image of Traudl, who remains angelic even as she flees the city wearing an SS helmet.
"The Downfall" wants to demonstrate how the German people, too, were victimized by Nazism. If guilty at all, it is only of overwrought nationalism, of misplaced loyalty, or of just plain naïveté?--anything but evil. Not even the Nazis are truly evil, only sick. They prefer to blow their brains out, or, like Göbbels's sociopathic wife, Magda, to poison their own children rather than let them live in a world without National Socialism. And, of all the Nazis, none is crazier -insane, not satanic- than Adolf Hitler.
Hitler's humanity, in fact, lasts for five minutes in the film's opening scene. Thereafter, he launches into a maelstrom of tirades, tantrums, and incoherent fits that culminate in his suicide. Since he is not a bad person, per se, but merely a lunatic, it follows that those who adored him were also unbalanced--temporarily, in the case of many Germans, terminally for the die-hard Nazis. By reducing the Third Reich to a limited dementia, "The Downfall" absolves the German people of any moral culpability for perpetrating World War II and destroying European Jewry. On the contrary, it casts them as heroic, even martyr-like. The movie closes with Traudl and the orphaned Peter Kranz together, cycling into the sunshine--the virgin and the golden-haired child, the progenitors of an immaculate Germany.
Perhaps to maintain her image as a virginal witness, the film passes over Traudl Junge's marriage to Hans Junge, who joined the SS-Leibstandarte, Hitler's personal guard, in 1933, and served as Hitler's orderly for three years.
In June 1943, Traudl married Hans Junge - just three months after she had stated that she "had no interest in men". The fact that they both worked close to Hitler enabled Hans Junge to - finally, after several pleas - get away from Hitler's entourage for a frontline duty in the ranks of the Waffen SS. He was killed a year later when a British plane strafed his company in Normandy in August 1944.
Most of the Israelis who lined up for "The Downfall" were too focused on its multi-faceted Führer to see this whitewashing. Others, yearning to be part of the New Europe, welcomed it. But the film is not meant for Israelis, nor even for Americans. Rather, its ideal viewers are twenty-something Germans who have made it the most popular film in their country's history. And understandably so, for they emerge from the theater convinced that their grandparents were valorous, victimized, and naïve, and that Germany can unreservedly take its place in a post-nationalist, post-psychotic Europe. They can enjoy watching the next generation of Germans play hide-and-seek around the abstract black cubes of Berlin's new Holocaust memorial, situated near the site of Hitler's Bunker.
Though some movies open with a disclaimer, "The Downfall" ends with one. Statistics appear on the screen--"Fifty million people were killed in World War II, and six million Jews died in German concentration camps" --couched in soothingly passive verbs.
The overall death and destruction that took place during World War II may well be beyond human comprehension. Historians estimate that military casualties on all sides, in both the European and Pacific theaters, reached up to 25 million, and that civilian casualties ranged from 38 million to as high a figure as 55 million – meaning that somewhere between 3 and 4 percent of the world’s total population died in the conflict.
"The Jewish Year Book" [London 1956] notes that it is commonly stated that six million Jews were "done to death by Hitler" but that Gerald Reitlinger has suggested a possible lower estimate of 4,194,200 "missing Jews" of whom an estimated one third died of natural causes. This would reduce the number of Jews deliberately exterminated to 2,796,000.
According to Raul Hilberg, as quoted in an article written by himself in the 1998 "Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia" under the heading 'Holocaust', the six camps, their means of killing and their total number of victims was as follows:
"Chelmno had gas vans, and its death toll was 150,000; Belzec had carbon monoxide gas chambers in which 600,000 Jews were killed; Sobibor’s gas chambers accounted for 250,000 dead; Treblinka’s for 700,000 to 800,000; At Majdanek, some 50,000 were gassed or shot; and in Auschwitz, the Jewish dead totaled more than 1 million".
-- Raul Hilberg, 'Holocaust', Microsoft "Encarta 98 Encyclopedia"
This only accounts for 2.8 million dead as the other camps did not have gas chambers.
Hilberg, in the third edition of his ground-breaking three-volume work, "The Destruction of the European Jews", estimates that 5.1 million Jews died during the Holocaust. This figure includes "over 800,000" who died from 'Ghettoization and general privation'.
Death Tolls:
Auschwitz 1,100,000 Jews and 200,000 others
Maidanek [Majdanek] 78,000 including 61,000 Jews, 12,000 Poles, 5,000 others including Soviet prisoners of war.
Chelmno 320,000
Treblinka 762,000
Sobibor 167,000
Belzec 434,000 - 500,000
Total fatalities 2,857,000 - 3,139,000
Source: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
In 1993 and 1994, Jean-Claude Pressac, then promoted by the international media as the expert on technical questions surrounding Auschwitz, in his book, "Les Crématoires d'Auschwitz/La Machinerie du meurtre de masse". éditions du CNRS, 1993 stated the total of the deaths in Auschwitz to be 775,000 - 800,000, of whom 630,000 were gassed Jews. But, in a translation in German of this book: "Die Krematorien von Auschwitz/Die Technik des Massenmordes". Munich, Piper, 1994, Pressac evaluates the number of the victims at 631,000 - 711,000, of whom from 470,000 to 550,000 were gassed Jews.
"Not too far away from [Pressac's latest figures] is the result of this study with presumed 510,000 deaths, 356,000 of which were probably murdered in the gas".
-- Fritjof Meyer, "Die Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz. Neue Erkenntnisse durch neue Archivfunde" [Number of Auschwitz Victims: New Insights from Recent Archival Discoveries]"Osteuropa", May 2002
Meyer is a leading journalist of Germany's biggest news magazine, the left-wing "Der Spiegel". His article appeared in the German geopolitical magazine "Osteuropa", which is published by the German Society for Eastern Europe under the directorship of Prof. Rita Süssmuth, who was once the president of the German parliament.
In 1995, an article, 'Enquête sur les camps de la mort,' by Jean-Claude Pressac dealing with the "pure extermination camps" Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec appeared in the French magazine "Historama".
In contrast to official historiography, according to which these camps were supposed to have been designed exclusively for exterminating Jews, Pressac believed they were originally established as transit and delousing camps.
Pressac pointed out that "between the end of 1941 until middle of 1942 in Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka, three steam delousing facilities were constructed".
He went on to explain:
"The Wannsee Conference on 20 January 1942, established a program for the deportation of Jews to the East, which necessarily included processing the deportees in these three sanitary facilities".
Subsequently, as Pressac wrote in the article, the delousing facilities were converted to extermination facilities, that is to say homicidal gas chambers.
It is unclear whether he actually believed this or simply made a tactical concession in order to have his article published.
At any rate, his revelation that the “eastern extermination camps” had been constructed as transit and delousing facilities shook official 'Holocaust' lore to the core.
In a later interview Pressac estimated the victim figures as 100,000-150,000 for Belzec, 30,000-35,000 for Sobibor, and 200,000-250,000 for Treblinka.
"It has not yet been possible to determine the exact total number of victims in a way which would stand up to a detailed examination, and this will most probably now never be feasible. For this reason, there has never been an official number of the victims among the Jewish population. Discussing the number of victims is therefore not always an offence. However, this does constitute an offence in each case where it is carried out with the aim of denying or trivialising the muder of millions of Jews".
In such cases, criminal prosecution is a matter for the criminal prosecution authorities and courts in the Federal Länder.
-- Bundesministerium der Justiz
6 January 1995